[Meaning] of words of threat [sc. in rising tone]; or of boasts with shouting; or of songs, in respect to the citharodic "steep-rising" style.
Also [sc. attested is the phrase] 'steep-rising style':
Timotheus the piper once piped the style called 'the steep-rising of Athena' and so amazed Alexander with his melodies (songs?) that, in the middle of listening to them, Alexander leapt to his arms. [They say that] he said that the royal pipe music should be just like that.
Timotheus, urgently invited, traveled to visit him.
*)orqiasma/twn: a)nata/sews r(hma/twn: h)\ tw=n meta\ boh=s ko/mpwn: h)\ tw=n melw=n: paro/son o)/rqios no/mos kiqarw|diko/s. kai\ *)/orqios no/mos: *timo/qeos o( au)lhth\s hu)/lei pote\ th=s *)aqhna=s to\n o)/rqion no/mon kalou/menon kai\ e)s toso/nde e)ce/plhtten *)ale/candron toi=s me/lesin, w(s metacu\ kai\ a)kou/santa a)i/+cai e)pi\ ta\ o(/pla. to\n de\ fa/nai, o(/ti toiau=ta xrh\ ei)=nai ta\ basilika\ au)lh/mata. o( de\ *timo/qeos a)nelh/luqe pro\s au)to/n, spoudh=| meta/pemptos geno/menos.
The headword, in the genitive plural (as direct object of a verb of hearing), is taken from
Aristophanes,
Acharnians 1042, and is the only use of this neuter noun known to us. The first part of the entry is taken from the
scholia to the line. It is important as evidence for the sense of
o)/rqios as 'sharply rising in a shrill tone' of tension and anger. The noun
a)na/tasis (also used of the acute or rising accent) and the verb
a)natei/nw from which it is derived denote the same tone of speaking that rises upwards in tension, either of threat or of boasting. See LSJ entries at web address 1, web address 2, and web address 3.
For the well-known
o)/rqios no/mos, 'steep-rising style', see also
omicron 575,
omicron 574,
alpha 1701,
alpha 1122,
chi 171, and cf. West 352-53 note 119. See also
omicron 585, with a pun of
Aristophanes on its similarity to
o)/rqrios 'dawn' of a cock's cry.
West describes the
nomos of Athena as 'probably a standard item in the Panathenaic musical contests' (West 216 and note 65). It was in the enharmonic genus and the Phrygian mode (ps.-Plut.
De musica 1133ff., 1143B-C;
Plato,
Cratylus 417E). It was, however, according to West, probably in 'something like dactylo-epitrite', for it is identified in the
scholia to
Euripides,
Orestes 1384, with the "chariot" nomos (
a(rma/teios no/mos), a dactylic rhythm. There is here, then, an unexplained contradiction of the usual hypothesis of the rhythm on which the "steep-rising" nomos was based (see
omicron 575).
The story of
Timotheus the piper does not illustrate the "steep-rising" citharodic style, under discussion here. Rather, it is discussed as a piper style at
chi 171.
Timotheus' encounter with Alexander (sc. the Great) also appears at
tau 620 and
alpha 1122 (cf. Dio Chrysostom,
Or. 1.6ff.; Anna Comnena,
Alexias p.4.1;
Eustathius,
Commentary on the Iliad 11.11). If this is Timotheos of Miletus,
tau 620, he was apparently a piper before he became a citharode (i.e. someone who sang his compositions in accompaniment to his playing of the cithara). For the Milesian's life and works, see OCD(4) 1484 '
Timotheus(1)'; RE 6A (1937) 1331-37; T.H. Janssen
Timotheus, Persae (1984); West 361ff.;
Greek Lyric, ed. D.A. Campbell (Loeb edn., 1993), vol. 5. 70-121; J. Hordern,
The Fragments of Timotheus of Miletus (2002). However, West p. 361 points out that the performing days of the Milesian, born c.450, can hardly have extended very far into the fourth century. Synchronicity with Alexander is impossible: T. of Miletus and T. the piper are homonyms from different eras.
No. of records found: 1
Page 1